Connect with us

Everything

Americans in sanctuary cities must be the catalysts for change

Published

on

The story prompting this article is old. In fact, I’ve already written about it before. Unfortunately, it’s so infuriating that it deserves to be written about again.

Portland is a sanctuary city. As a result, two women became victims of a 12-time-deported violent criminal who committed heinous acts against them. He should never have been allowed back onto the streets to commit these crimes, but that’s life in a sanctuary city. Living in one means law enforcement is politically compelled to put American citizens in danger in an effort to protect those who have entered the country illegally.

Welcome to progressive America.

Here’s the problem. Attempts by the federal government to stop this practice are taking the wrong approach. It is ultimately the responsibility of a city, county, and/or state to handle law enforcement within their own jurisdiction. Just as it’s wrong for them to not protect their own citizens in favor of non-citizens, it’s also wrong for the federal government to attempt to mandate compliance. They cannot compel local governments or law enforcement to do the bidding of federal law enforcement. On the surface, this might stance seem counterproductive, but it’s important to make this distinction: one can be against sanctuary cities and also be against federal mandates preventing sanctuary cities from existing. The two are not mutually exclusive.

If local governments are forced to comply with federal mandates, the overreach that already exists in DC will be perpetuated. When does it end? The more we allow the federal government to dictate the law of the land, the less autonomy state and local governments will have. This is not a good thing for the people.

The only viable solution to the sanctuary city problem is for the people living in sanctuary cities to say, “enough is enough.”

It’s the people who must force the hands of local politicians and law enforcement. They are the ones who are in danger and must exercise their rights through petitions, assembly, and at the ballot box. If that’s not possible, then it’s their right to move to a city or state that treats criminal illegal immigrants as criminals rather than as people who are somehow granted greater protections than actual U.S. citizens.

Sanctuary cities are a big problem, particularly for those living in them. It’s up to the people to make the changes necessary to defend their rights and protect themselves and their families. If the federal government steps in, they will only make things worse in the long run.

Democrats

PragerU: What’s wrong with government-run healthcare?

Published

on

By

PragerU Whats wrong with government-run healthcare

This latest video from PragerU details how another vote-buying pipe dream from the Left can never work.

A new video from PragerU features policy expert Lanhee Chen from the Hoover Institution at Stanford, who explains how ‘Free Healthcare’ can never work in the real world. As is the case with most Leftist vote-buying schemes, the ‘The Medicare for all’ fiction is long on promises and short on how it will be funded. The tax burden for such a scheme would destroy the economy and would have to be levied on almost everyone. This kind of national socialized healthcare would also take away the incentive for innovation, which has made for the best healthcare system in the states and the rest of the world.

One often suspects that these assurances of freebies are never meant to operate as promised. Witness the much vaunted Obamacare that was supposed to eliminate the uninsured, but did nothing of the sort. Such is also the case with their push for Liberty control, since it never works as advertised.  In most cases, it should be apparent that the Left doesn’t care if their schemes will work or not. If they did actually care, they would try something else, something that actually works.

For the Left, their ‘Ends justifies the means’ mantra extends to most of their agenda. It doesn’t matter if their system of societal slavery works or not, only that it brings them the power they crave.

Continue Reading

Immigration

Honduran caravan is a direct result of Democrat talking points

Published

on

Honduran caravan is a direct result of Democrat talking points

In Honduras, El Salvador, and Guatemala, the message from America is clear: “Around half of the population and politicians will protect you from ICE. Come to America and you won’t get deported, especially if you have children with you.”

The reason they believe this is because mainstream media in the United States has been pushing the Democrats’ narrative for months. News travels fast to Central America, but it doesn’t always retain its accuracy as it crosses the border. We can see this fact in the numbers.

In August of this year, 12,700 parents and children were apprehended at the U.S.-Mexico border. August of last year saw only 4,193 similar apprehensions. We can also see it when looking at all illegal immigrants with 37,544 apprehended in August of this year. A month later, the number grew over 10% to nearly 42,000.

Democrats have been spreading the word through their campaigns that they will protect illegal immigrants. In an election year, it’s imperative for them that they get Hispanic voters to come out, so they’ve crafted a narrative that appeals to them.

Unfortunately, it also appeals to people such as the 4,000 currently marching their caravan towards the United States border.

Honduran migrant caravan grows to 4,000 amid spike in U.S. border crossings

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/honduran-migrant-caravan-grows-4000-amid-spike-u-s-border-n921286Shelters and churches along the border have been flooded as a result of the surge as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have been releasing hundreds of migrants from detention at a time.

Many of the Hondurans traveling in the caravan are children, some traveling with their parents and some without their parents, according to the documents. Because children are afforded special protections in the U.S., their arrival is creating anxiety within the Trump administration that has pledged to decrease illegal immigration. President Donald Trump said last week that he would consider separating migrant families at the border once again, after reversing his controversial “zero tolerance” policy in June.

The Trump administration is trying to dissuade the caravan from invading the United States. President Trump has even threatened to stop aid from being sent to Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.

The best hope for stopping the caravan before it reaches the United States is for Mexico to stop them at their southern border. Over 500 additional federal officers have been sent to the border to stop the caravan.

My Take

I am a huge proponent of legal immigration and a hawk when it comes to stopping illegal immigration. Congress didn’t fund the border wall yet, so we have to rely on the brave men and women of ICE and border patrol to close the flood gates.

The situations in Central America and Mexico are horrendous. The people fear for their lives from crime, malnutrition, and disease. They need help. That’s why we’re sending aid. Perhaps we should get more directly involved, but either way we cannot let their situation make us turn a blind eye towards our own problems with illegal immigration.

The surge in illegal immigration should be blamed wholeheartedly on the Democrats who spread false information that entices people to come. Imagine what would happen if they got control of the House, Senate, or both.

Continue Reading

Economy

Wayne Dupree on cutting entitlement programs

Published

on

Wayne Dupree on cutting entitlement programs

When the truth goes against the narrative, it’s hard for many to swallow. Entitlement reform, which has been on the Republican platform for decades, has been in the perpetual state of always getting promised but never getting delivered. The reason it keeps getting kicked down the road is because it’s simply too hard to take away things that millions have gotten used to receiving.

At least President Trump was honest enough to say from the beginning that he wasn’t touching entitlements.

What Democrats don’t want you to know and what Republicans only want you to remember on election day is that entitlements are crippling the economy. We can no longer say they’re going to hurt our children and grandchildren. It’s now to the point that we can’t make fiscal decisions as a country without considering the huge chunk that encompasses entitlements.

Conservative Radio Host Wayne Dupree has been fighting this battle for a while. He rightly contends that the pain we’d feel today if entitlements were cut is small compared to the pain we’ll feel in the near future and beyond if they’re not cut.

Yes, it’s hard to make cuts to something that supports millions of Americans, but there are ways to reform the system and still protect the most vulnerable. Kudos to Wayne Dupree for fighting this unpopular battle.

Continue Reading
Advertisement Donate to NOQ Report
Advertisement

Facebook

Twitter

Trending

Copyright © 2018 NOQ Report