Connect with us

Culture and Religion

How conservatives can begin to retake control, not commit suicide

Published

on

Conservatives have often been our worst enemy, supporting our opponents while they return the favor by refusing to patronize our businesses or hire us.

Erick Erickson penned a great retort to Kurt Schlichter’s piece advocating a strategic abandonment of adherence to the rule of law — if not to greater principles of liberty and Judeo-Christian morality.

However, Erickson failed to provide a strategic alternative. If Schlichter’s position represents A, then Erickson is anti-A.

What conservatives need, and are yearning for, is B. A Plan B, a third way, a different way of thinking and acting out of the box.

Let me sketch out the values underlying the strategic alternative, before I explain how the strategy can be executed. Values matter, not because we’ve been taught that. Values matter, because they will guide us when the unpredictable occurs and we need to adapt, react and respond on the fly.

The first value we need is respect for the individual. The second value is respect for the rule of law. I’m afraid that using Leftist tactics against Leftists compromises those values, but also endangers our families and sense of belonging.

However, the strongest argument against using Leftist violent tactics arises from understanding the most critical difference between us, and the Left. It is sad to say this, but it is necessary: A substantial number of Leftists have nothing they’ve earned, taken pride in, or no one whom they care about. Just ask yourself the last time you remember seeing a smiling Leftist.

Conservatives are the opposite. We care about our families, about our history, our sense of who we are. This carries on to our communities and certainly to our faith. All of those things are endangered by violence. If we were to adopt Leftist violence as a modus operandi, we would be jeopardizing all those things we hold dear. Yet our battlefield opponents would have no such emotional grounding; they have nothing, so they feel they have nothing to lose.

In any physical confrontation, the side that “doesn’t care” has a huge advantage over the side which does. It’s as simple as feeling the risk of loss, the fear of loved ones being hurt or deprived. Our opponents don’t share those emotions. That alone tilts the battlefield. It’s an emotional advantage.

Our sense of morality, our sense of limits on what is permissible behavior, also presents a handicap. Again, quite simply, there are actions we will not take. Our Leftist street opponents may have, literally, no limits. Nothing is out of bounds for them.
To sum these thoughts up, to adopt Leftist violence is to fight this cultural (if not civil) war on a battlefield where the Leftists set the terms of battle, we are unfamiliar with the terrain and where we have no discernible advantages — not one — to compensate for our moral limits.

So what are conservatives to do?

First, we can resolve to fight this battle on our terms, on our terrain and when we choose to engage. There are plenty of spaces in our lives where we retain control, and can retain control tomorrow and beyond.  While Leftists are now overtly pressuring and punishing conservatives with economic reprisal (from censorship based on arbitrary violations of website terms of use, to hiring and firing decisions based on political expression), we still have economic and intellectual capital. We just have to use them.

Secondly, we need to become bold and exercise our “stakeholder’s veto.” That means asserting the power which comes from holding and owning capital. Many of us are homeowners; some of us own and run businesses. We are in positions of authority and control. That does not mean we have a mandate to be bullies, but nor does it suggest we must be timid in the face of attempts to destroy our economy, our culture and our institutions. It means we must stop feeding the hands which seek to choke us.

Conservatives have often been our worst enemy, supporting our opponents while they return the favor by refusing to patronize our businesses or hire us. Yet there are ways to exercise our power, quickly and quietly and without the risk of confrontation. Informal boycotts, reflecting just your conscious choice to select one brand instead of another, based on an ideological screen, are ways to impact the bottom line of large corporations which feel there is no penalty right now for offending or denigrating our values. (A great resource for this is the 2ndVote website which allows you to search for companies based on some major issues.) Meanwhile, those of us in the management corps have the decision-making power and should — and corporate fiduciary duties of due care and loyalty actually require us to — base decisions on our values. There is a clear economic rationale; our opponents too often push values which undermine the performance of any private-sector enterprise. Put simply: Marxists make bad employees.

Innovators don’t succeed by waiting for permission. They are disruptive by nature, and here, disruption means to compete with an eye towards winning.  When we innovate, we can and should start our own businesses and support each other. The networks need not be formal.  Many immigrant groups came here and built their own institutions — religious, economic, educational, social, even quasi-governmental. We can do the same, and it may be true that now, we must do the same.

Success can never be assured. However, these simple steps will help us assert some independence from control by Leftist-controlled institutions. Once that is achieved, we can begin functioning from an emotional platform not of fear, but of hope. Instead of reacting, we can start acting, building our own enterprises and running the show with a renewed mission and deeper sense of urgency.

Conservatives cannot begin to take back our culture and our institutions while fearful for our jobs, our careers and our families. Economic independence is a quickly achievable goal which, once attained, prevents our enemies from destroying those things most meaningful to us.

Once we can afford to fight, the foundation will be set for additional strategies to reclaim our nation.

Conservative corporate lawyer, commentator, blockchain technology patent holder and entrepreneur. Headquartered in a red light district in the middle of a deep blue People's Republic.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Culture and Religion

Are Men Economically Obsolete?

Published

on

Technological advances and globalization are prime reasons why over seven million middle-aged men aged 25-54 are not in the American “labor force.”

It may get even worse. A new report from a Federal Reserve official suggests these men are “unlikely to return to the labor force” based on current trends.

Demographic factors drive their nonparticipation, argues Fed economist Didem Tuzemen, who found that disability or illness was the most common cause of no participation.

However, the economist also pointed to “job polarization,” meaning the decline in demand for “middle-skill” workers caused by technological advances and globalization. The fed economist argues that if it weren’t for these economic and technological shifts, nearly two million more men would have been employed in 2016, or 3.6% more employment of men in this age group.


Resources:

Why Are Prime-Age Men Vanishing from the Labor Force? by Diden Tuzemen

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Mass Murders, Mass Shootings, Who are we going to allow to influence us?

Published

on

Neil Degrasse Tyson is not only one of the new darlings of the mainstream progressive media, he is basically the new Carl Sagan. I can say that because he was the presenter of the updated version of Sagan’s 1980 television series “Cosmos” which become one of the most watched science documentaries of the 20th century and set the standard for other shows like it to follow, including the recent follow-up. A second Cosmos series with Tyson is currently in the pipeline.

With the Parkland, Fla. school shooting added to the list of many other school shootings, Tyson decided to present his remedy on his Twitter feed to help the human race heal and better themselves.

“Evidence collected over many years, obtained from many locations, indicates that the power of Prayer is insufficient to stop bullets from killing school children.”

Harvard psychologist and outspoken humanist Stephen Pinker chimed in on MSNBC’s “Hugh Hewitt”: “What was the benevolent shepherd doing while the teenager was massacring his classmates? If you’re counting on God to make the world a better place you are probably going to make the world a worse place because he is not listening and we saw that yesterday.”

He’s not alone. The Freedom From Religion Foundation likes to remind those who pray daily that “Nothing Fails Like Prayer.” While certain elements of the so-called enlightenment coupled with scientific advances might have debunked certain superstitions, they moved us away from God’s law and embraced evil ideals.

I am sure that most if not all Big “A” Atheists embrace and admire the ideals and philosophies of Charles Darwin. Darwin’s ideals of natural selection and evolution were taken to heart by several different men over the years. Jeffrey Dahmer in an interview with NBC News said that he believed in Darwinian evolution and that led him to become a serial killer and sex offender. He received a life sentence but along the way, he renounced his belief in Darwin and embraced creationism. Dahmer was murdered by another prisoner in Nov. 1994.

Adolf Hitler’s vision of a new Germany only came on the world stage not only because of the of the theories of Darwin but also from the notions of Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche believed that those who are stronger in the world must attack, conquer and eventually murder those who are weaker than they are. Did you know that Nietzsche admitted that his conclusions came from Lucifer himself? He actually said it. Nietzsche’s “might makes right” view coupled with Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” proved to be a toxic cocktail for the human race.

Eric Harris drank this toxin via his education in the public education system. Many at Columbine High School in Denver, Colo. would pay the price. This included Cassie Bernall who was immortalized by many evangelical Christians in the Michael W. Smith song “This Is Your Time.”

Just another consequence of forbidding the existence of God in the public school classroom in the name of “separation of church and state.” You can’t honor God for they say He does not exist. We act astonished when another school shooting happens or a would-be tyrant tries to play God, and yet these humanists want us to be better ourselves without God’s help. They are true fools, or they know God exists and they are trying to weasel out of accountability for their sinful actions.

Harris and Dahmer were men with little to no power and it did not end well for either of them. The masterminds like Tyson and Pinker who have money and are well-off are in high places, can seek to use their leverage to empower people and advance causes that fit with their visions of what they think will be a better world. They will fail as well.

Trouble is, it will likely lead to another tyrant who demands that the human race renounces God. Jeffrey Dahmer believed in Darwinian evolution, took ideas of creationism that turned him around before he was murdered by another prisoner. Eric Harris took Darwin’s doctrine of Natural Selection no differently than Hitler. He paid attention to the “teacher rap” and took it to heart. Friedrich Nietzsche admitted being influenced by the devil himself. His views influenced Harris and Hitler.

Who are we going to allow to influence us? Neil Degrasse Tyson? Stephen Pinker? The mainstream media? There are consequences for kicking God out of schools and breaking His laws-we are seeing it today.


This article was originally published in The Christian Post
https://www.christianpost.com/voice/mass-murders-mass-shootings-and-the-need-to-return-to-god-and-his-holy-law.html

Other references
https://www.dailywire.com/news/27320/americas-leading-scientists-degrasse-tyson-and-ben-shapiro

https://www.generations.org/programs/869

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

In a violent world, it’s time to do the right thing “for the children”

Published

on

In the never-ending assault on liberty, Progressive Democrats and Republicans often resort to using children as a type of political cover for their otherwise unpopular agenda. We are witnessing this right now as they work to dismantle the Second Amendment following the Florida high school shooting.

But let’s face it; who can say “no” to an agenda when it’s “for the children?”

Clearly, this ploy has paid huge dividends for big-government Progressives. One need look no further than the recent budget negotiations where the obsolete Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) was renewed for 6 years. Or the recent suggestion to use Social Security to finance big-government’s newest entitlement—Ivanka Trump’s Paid Family Leave.

Quite honestly “for the children” has been so successful that I’ve decided to adopt it myself. While Progressives use it to destroy freedom, I will use it to defend the Constitution.

For example, as I mentioned earlier, Progressives are using the Florida tragedy to void the Second Amendment to keep children safe. But I will defend gun rights because it’s the only way we can keep them safe. Unarmed Americans in gun-free zones will only lead to more tragedies like Florida, not fewer.

Additionally, I will defend the First Amendment “for the children.” What future awaits the next generation if liberty is destroyed due to being raised on political correctness and spending their time in safe-spaces?

In fact, I will defend the entire Constitution “for the children.” What future will the next generation have if tyranny replaces freedom?

I will also fight for the Convention of States‘ goal for a balanced budget amendment “for the children.” What kind of future will they have if they are forced to pay for our fiscal irresponsibility? And I will fight to end abortion “for the (unborn) children,” because they are deprived of even having a future when they are deprived their right to life.

While there will certainly be more issues to fight for, it’s time to get ready America. The Strident Conservative is going to be more strident than ever because, after all, it’s “for the children.”

Originally posted on The Strident Conservative.

 

David Leach is the owner of The Strident Conservative. His politically incorrect and always “right” columns are featured on RedState.com, NOQReport.com, and TheResurgent.com.

His daily radio commentary is nationally syndicated with Salem Radio Network and can be heard on stations across America.

Follow the Strident Conservative on Twitter and Facebook.

Subscribe to receive podcasts of radio commentaries: iTunes | Stitcher | Tune In | RSS

Continue Reading

NOQ Report Daily

Advertisement

Facebook

Twitter

Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 NOQ Report.