Connect with us

Everything

Trump, the Sociopath, must be removed

Published

on

Heather Heyer, a victim of the rally of hatred and violence that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia, last weekend, was not yet cold in her grave before Donald Trump used these evil events as an opportunity to brag about his Virginia winery. However, first things first: before Republicans even get started, Obama’s actions do not excuse Donald Trump. What Hillary did wrong does not excuse Donald Trump. The movement of anger and hate on the Left does not excuse Donald Trump. This inhumane and vile individual needs to be removed from the highest office in the land.

Donald Trump has all the characteristics of a sociopath

Until this point, I considered Donald Trump a narcissistic, mentally unstable bully. Now, without reservation, I call him a sociopath.

Sociopaths are unable to connect to any other human being at any emotional level. Heather Heyer had just been murdered in the prime of her life, and when Donald Trump was asked by reporters if he was going to visit Charlottesville or the family of the victim, his response was:

I own a house in Charlottesville. Does anyone know I own a house in Charlottesville? Oh boy! It’s in Charlottesville. You’ll see. It’s a winery.” Within seconds, amidst an onslaught of questions from the media, his bragging continued. He said: “I own actually one of the largest wineries in the United States.” This type of response, in my opinion, could only come from the lips of a sociopath.

Mr. Trump, I speak to you specifically: you were not asked about what you own or how big it is because NOBODY CARES. You were asked if you were going to visit this battle-ravaged part of Virginia and the bereaved family of Heather Heyer. Who in God’s name cares what you own or where your wineries are located? This country is in chaos. People are being murdered. Nazis are marching into America’s cities waving Hitler’s flag. United States citizens are being injured and killed by other United States citizens. The country is fractured by anger, hate and violence, and you, Mr. Trump, see only an opportunity at a press conference to brag about your properties and your own imagined greatness. You are not a normal human being.

Where are you, America?

America must work night and day to remove this evil individual from the position for which he was never qualified. Trump’s behavior should make every American physically ill, regardless of the Party to which that person has pledged allegiance.

When it was almost impossible for this pathetic, sad and despicable excuse for a president– and for that matter a human being–to become more repulsive, more disgusting and more self-obsessed, he found a way.

Trump must be removed under the 25th amendment. The man is a sociopath.

Liked it? Take a second to support NOQ Report on Patreon!
Continue Reading
Advertisement
11 Comments

11 Comments

  1. july.heaven@yandex.com

    August 18, 2017 at 3:39 pm

    Truth once again from an awesome writer!

  2. The Real Valerie M. (@TheRealValerieM)

    August 18, 2017 at 3:43 pm

    Rock on, true Americans…the GOP IS OVER!

  3. July Harris

    August 18, 2017 at 4:28 pm

    What is up with my friends comments going on but not mine when we’re right here! My email is valid and that really is my name. This is great writing!

  4. Sharon

    August 18, 2017 at 4:29 pm

    I rarely have a gut reaction to an article, but this time I did. Broadt appealed to all Americans to remove Trump as POTUS, an appeal that should be HEARD by all decent, intelligent citizens. My concern, or rather, my deep, gut-twisting feeling, is that yes, we do have a sociopath for President, and more importantly my concern is this: IS THERE ANYBODY OUT THERE? Or have we become so immune to violence, hate, sex crimes and vulgarity that we don’t recognize it even while it squats in the White House?

  5. Makar Trenovskya

    August 18, 2017 at 4:41 pm

    No, July…we see them!

  6. Susan Hauck

    August 18, 2017 at 7:20 pm

    OMG! This was a fantastic article! There’s nothing lower than a Nazi and he is one, unless his mind is gone. But no, he’s all there just like Hitler was, as all there as those guys can be. Don’t mind posting MY opinion on that. Jesse rock on!

  7. Bobbie Coulter

    August 19, 2017 at 2:38 am

    I have said this since day 1. Being married to a sociopath for 12 years I am quite familiar with the signs. Thanks for writing this Jesse! I only pray that those in the WH and on the Hill will wake up and take action before this country, my home, is totally destroyed.

  8. Danny Lamar (@4liberty7777)

    August 19, 2017 at 7:33 am

    The Bible warns about people who “glory in their shame”! It’s definitely a shame when someone who is supposed to be a leader of the United States cannot stop himself from bragging about possessions when innocent people have been hurt and killed!
    Great job here speaking the truth that we need to hear…keep it coming!

  9. Cassie

    August 19, 2017 at 1:59 pm

    Finally an article that calls Trump what he is instead of saying “but Hillary, but Obama, but Hillary but Obama…” Nice

    • Susan

      August 20, 2017 at 6:28 am

      Yes! Nice comment, Cassie. Getting sick of the “but Hillary, but, Hillary..”

  10. Catalina Hererra

    August 20, 2017 at 9:53 am

    Facts for those who need the facts shoved in their face. Thanks! YOU never white wash the truth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Culture and Religion

Why abortion must be fought politically AND culturally

Published

on

Why abortion must be fought politically AND culturally

Last week, I jumped in on a heated Twitter debate between a conservative writer and a pro-life policy wonk. Though they both wanted to reduce or eliminate abortions in America, they were fighting over whether it was practical or even fair to charge women who get abortions with a felony. Obviously this debate was set within a hypothetical world in which abortions were already illegal, but it’s worthwhile to plan steps that need to be taken if Roe v Wade were overturned, or if some other laws at the state or national level made abortion-on-demand illegal.

Both sides made pretty epic arguments supporting their side, but both missed the bigger picture. Abortion is, at the very least, a two-front war. There are a few smaller fronts where the war can be waged, but the two primary battlefields are political/legal and cultural. Most pro-lifers fight the political battle. They may invoke faith-based arguments or post videos from the womb to pull at the heartstrings, but when they do so within the framework of the law, they’re still making a political argument.

The pro-abortion side is focusing on the cultural side of the debate… and they’re winning. It’s not because they have the better argument. It’s because the pro-lifers are neglecting this front, and the few that are actually addressing it are doing so with a generally poor strategy. Most are relying on judges and legislation as the way to stop abortions. Meanwhile, they’re losing ground on the cultural front.

How is the left so adept at fighting the culture war? Because they’re framing their arguments within a bigger picture. Their focus on the collective rights of people groups has made their willing sheep abandon what they once knew in their hearts, that killing preborn babies is fundamentally wrong.

The left’s message is that if you believe in equal rights, then you MUST believe in women’s rights. Not too long ago they called it “reproductive rights” but they abandoned that when they realized they could position abortion within the greater women’s rights narrative and get away with it. We’ve seen some pushback by prominent pro-life women, but it’s not enough. To win the cultural war against the womb will require utilizing a variation of the same tactics used by the left.

There are three fundamental truths that pro-lifers must understand if we’re going to win the culture war as it pertains to abortion.

  1. Statistics are counterproductive. I cringe every time I see or hear someone spouting out statistics like there are 125,000 abortions worldwide every day or that over 50,000,000 Americans have been murdered through abortion since it was made legal. It’s not that the statistics are wrong. It’s that they only have an impact on those who already oppose abortion. Those who support abortion do so knowing that many abortions happen and they don’t really care because to them, these weren’t people. Whether they think of them as fetuses or potential humans or parasites or whatever, they’re not going to be swayed by arguments that abortions are rampant.
  2. Science is on our side. Every week, there are new stories highlighting certain attributes of preborn babies that need to be communicated to the masses. They feel pain. They dream. They’re often viable at a much earlier stage of development than previously believed. There’s still a large portion of the population that believes a baby’s heart starts beating when they leave the womb. So much effort is made to use the science on the political side, we often forget that it works from a cultural perspective as well, perhaps more so. We need to educate the people so they understand that preborn babies aren’t just potential humans. They’re humans.
  3. Framing is everything. Just as the left has framed abortion as part of women’s rights, so too must pro-lifers frame the right to exist as a human right. This may seem like a political argument instead of a cultural one, and it is, but when we do so from the perspective of right versus wrong, we can allow the argument to transcend into the part of consciousness that touches on cultural ethics. But framing doesn’t just end with making it a human right to live. We have to frame abortion itself with other topics that people may find despicable. Here are three examples of talking points that frame the abortion debate in a culturally favorable way for pro-lifers that have the potential to reach those who are either pro-abortion or indifferent.
    1. Planned Parenthood was born from the tenets of racism and population control and continues those missions today.
    2. Pushing for gun control to save lives while endorsing abortion-on-demand is a contradiction.
    3. The elite promote abortion knowing it is far more rampant among the poor and minorities. This is no accident. It’s by design.

The war on the womb cannot be won through political means. It cannot be won through cultural shifts. It can only be won when both fronts are addressed simultaneously. Pro-abortionists are doing it. It’s time pro-lifers learn a lesson from the enemy.

Liked it? Take a second to support NOQ Report on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Democrats

Tucker on new NJ gun ban: Venezuela banned gun ownership before country’s collapse

Published

on

By

Tucker on new NJ gun ban Venezuela banned gun ownership before countrys collapse

Tucker Carlson makes the point that the Leftists opposing Liberty should target criminals instead of the innocent.

Letting Tucker Carlson speak for himself, But we’re emphasizing two important points:

  1. Gun Confiscation has nothing to do with ‘safety’ or ‘protecting the children’ but empowering the Socialist Left. Crime has skyrocket in the Socialist Utopia of Venezuela after the government disarmed the people. Just as the Left wants to do in the states.
  2. He also made the point that indicates the other party is arguing in bad faith.  If they really were concerned about gun violence, then they would go after that small segment of the population that is committing this violence. Instead they are going after innocent gun owners.
Tucker on New NJ Gun Law: Venezuela Banned Gun Ownership Before Country’s Collapse

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/12/17/new-jersey-gun-law-bans-magazines-more-10-rounds-tucker-carlson-bernard-kerik-reactHe said that in Venezuela, the point was not to make people safer, but to “disarm the public.” Now, it is a felony in New Jersey for ordinary citizens to “defend themselves,” Carlson added.

Bernard Kerik, who was Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s NYPD police commissioner, said on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” that the law is a “cunning way to attack the legal gun owners.”

Liked it? Take a second to support NOQ Report on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Economy

Nearly $5 billion being sent to Mexico while border wall languishes in political hell

Published

on

Nearly 5 billion being sent to Mexico while border wall languishes in political hell

Talk about adding insult to injury. Not only are we nowhere nearer to getting the wall built on our southern border, but now taxpayer dollars are actually being sent to Mexico to fund development.

This is not a joke, though it’s actually pretty funny.

Today, we learned the White House may be backing down on shutting down the government to get Congress to fund the down payment on the border wall.

Is the White House backing down on the government shutdown?

http://noqreport.com/2018/12/18/white-house-backing-government-shutdown/The White House seems to be in damage-control mode as it shifts from claiming the President will shut down the government if he doesn’t get $5 billion in wall funding to now saying the President could find other ways to get the money for the border wall if DHS budget isn’t sufficient.

This is a clear departure from the bold words during last week’s public standoff between the President and his friends on the Democratic side, Senator Chuck Schumer and Representative Nancy Pelosi. At that point, the President was willing to “carry the mantle” of “Trump’s Shutdown” if he didn’t get a CR that included $5 billion for DHS.

Now we’re learning that the United States is sending over $10 billion to Central America and southern Mexico in an aid package designed to stimulate economic growth in the impoverished region, including $4.8 billion to Mexico.

US pledges $10.6B aid for Central America, southern Mexico

http://noqreport.com/2018/12/18/us-pledges-10-6b-aid-central-america-southern-mexico/The plan was announced in a joint U.S.-Mexican statement released by the State Department and read aloud by Mexican Foreign Relations Secretary Marcelo Ebrard in the Mexican capital.

“In sum I think this is good news, very good news for Mexico,” Ebrard said.

Newly inaugurated President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador waxed poetic about the plan to provide jobs so people won’t have to emigrate.

I wasn’t one of those who fell for the idea that the President was going to get Mexico to pay for the border wall, but I never thought I’d see the wall languishing in political hell while we’re sending nearly the exact amount needed to start the wall to Mexico instead. This isn’t the type of change we were promised. This isn’t draining the swamp.

Drudge encapsulated it perfectly with their current top headlines.

Drudge Report

Whether this is some sort of poetic justice against those who thought things would be different or a cruel joke on the nation, one thing is certain. We’re not seeing the progress on stopping illegal immigration that we were promised. Not even close.

Liked it? Take a second to support NOQ Report on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Facebook

Twitter

Trending

Copyright © 2018 NOQ Report