Connect with us

Everything

Federalist Party strategy: Focus on local races

Published

on

Many times when we post something to social media, there’s a question that pops up: “What races have you won?” Considering we officially launched this year, the answer should be pretty obvious. We understand the need for the question, though. The vast majority of political parties in America have never won an election.

This is the first reason we intend to start with local races, but it’s not the most important. We’ll get to the most important reason below, but let’s address reality. We live in a two-party system. It was a fear of many of the founders that a party system would arise, but in particular some of them specifically feared a two-party system. We’re seeing very clearly today why this was such a worry for them. They knew we would experience exactly what we’re experiencing: a self-perpetuating system that blocks attempts from the outside and protects itself as a single Democratic-Republican establishment.

That’s not to say that we have a single-party system (though sometimes it seems like we do), but it’s clear that they’ve stacked the deck against other parties to prevent them from gaining entry. When there is a binary choice, people are willing to accept less than the desirable. Republican leadership knows they don’t have to appeal to conservatives because there’s no fear of them voting for Democrats. Meanwhile, Democrats can ignore moderates in their party as they continue their push to the left with socialistic principles and massive government overreach.

Our focus on local, city, county, and state elections at this early stage in our development is strategic. It’s a waste of time, talent, and treasure to throw out sacrificial “protest” candidates to run in races we have no chance of winning. This doesn’t stop other third parties who love to throw their resources towards big national races in hopes of drawing attention even when they know they can’t win. We view it differently. We want to win.

The other, more important reason we are focused on local elections stems from the premise of small-government federalism itself. As we strive to rein in DC’s power, it’s imperative that we have people in place to take the lead at these “lower” levels when the decisions given to them by the U.S. Constitution (as well as state variations) are finally honored once more. The people have more say in local politics with representatives living near them. Their votes are more prominent when it’s one of thousands or tens of thousands instead of millions. Lastly, the choices made on behalf of the people by their local representatives will have more direct influence over their lives.

We need limited-government-minded individuals on city councils, in school boards, and in sheriff’s offices. We need Federalists in place as state legislators, mayors, and even governors. There will come a time when we’re ready to win U.S. Senate seats or even the White House, but we’re not going to bypass the low hanging fruit and waste the resources given to us by those who believe in our cause.

We’re asking two things at this point: take a good look at what we’re doing and if you like what you’re seeing, please spread the word. Never in history has there been an opportunity quite like this. Today, there are millions of Americans who are angry with their party. While this is beneficial to us, what we really want is for people to be hopeful about what we’re doing. It’s easy to appeal to people’s passions AGAINST the current system, but for sustainable growth we need people to be passionate FOR a vision of a better future. That future is the Federalist Party.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guns and Crime

Border Patrol arrests 32 at San Diego demonstration

Published

on

Border Patrol arrests 32 at San Diego demonstration

SAN DIEGO (AP) — U.S. Border Patrol agents arrested 32 people at a demonstration Monday that was organized by a Quaker group on the border with Mexico, authorities said. Demonstrators were calling for an end to detaining and deporting immigrants and showing support for migrants in a caravan of Central American asylum seekers.

A photographer for The Associated Press saw about a dozen people being handcuffed after they were told by agents to back away from a wall that the Border Patrol calls “an enforcement zone.” The American Friends Service Committee, which organized the demonstration, said 30 people were stopped by agents in riot gear and taken into custody while they tried to move forward to offer a ceremonial blessing near the wall.

Border Patrol spokesman Theron Francisco said 31 people were arrested for trespassing and one was arrested for assaulting an officer.

More than 300 people, many the leaders of churches, mosques, synagogues and indigenous communities, participated in the demonstration at San Diego’s Border Field State Park, which borders Tijuana, Mexico.

The rally held on a beach divided by the border wall was the second confrontation for Border Patrol agents since a caravan of more than 6,000 migrants, predominantly Hondurans, reached Tijuana last month. A confrontation with rock-throwers from Mexico led to U.S. agents firing tear gas into Mexico on Nov. 25 and a five-hour closure of the nation’s busiest border crossing.

Thousands of migrants are living in crowded tent cities in Tijuana after undertaking a grueling journey from Central America to the U.S. border. Many face waiting weeks or months in Mexico while they apply for asylum. The U.S. is processing up to about 100 claims a day at the San Diego crossing, which is creating a backlog.

The demonstration Monday was meant to launch a national week of action called “Love Knows No Borders: A moral call for migrant justice,” which falls between Human Rights Day on Monday, and International Migrants’ Day on Dec. 18, the group said.

“Showing up to welcome and bless children, mothers and fathers seeking asylum from very difficult and dehumanizing circumstances is the right and humane thing to do,” said Bishop Minerva G. Carcano, from the San Francisco Area United Methodist Church. “How we act in these moments determines who we will become as a nation.”

The group also is calling on Congress to defund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection.

Continue Reading

Entertainment and Sports

Latest Godzilla: King of Monsters trailer may mean it’s actually getting released next year

Published

on

Latest Godzilla King of Monsters trailer may mean its actually getting released next year

One of next year’s early blockbusters will be Godzilla: King of the Monsters. It is scheduled for May 31 after being pushed repeatedly to position it against the competition. This newest release date will give Marvel’s Avengers: End Game plenty of time to eat up audience dollars before passing the baton.

Originally slated for this year, executives kept looking for the best window for their second installment of what they hope to be a franchise similar to the successful Planet of the Apes reboot. The first installment of Godzilla in 2014 was widely seen as the first legitimate blockbuster featuring the Japanese monster after a handful of clunky attempts. It did well with a strong cast (including Bryan Cranston) and chalked up over $500 million at the worldwide box office against 75% on Rotten Tomatoes.

This installment features Millie Bobby Brown who has experience fighting demonic beasts in Netflix Stranger Things.

My only concern is that they seem to be putting out all the major bad monsters in this one – Mothra, Rodan, and King Ghidorah. It lends to the notion that this will be limited to a trilogy with the climax being Godzilla vs. Kong, crossing over the giant ape’s own franchise.

Continue Reading

Healthcare

Brett Kavanaugh punts on Planned Parenthood cases, leaving conservatives baffled

Published

on

Brett Kavanaugh punts on Planned Parenthood cases leaving conservatives baffled

Conservatives were cheering when Justice Brett Kavanaugh was finally confirmed after a tumultuous process that polarized the nation. Leftists argued that Kavanaugh’s confirmation would be the end for women’s rights to make choices about abortions, among other things, even before the confirmation turned into a high school sexual assault circus.

Instead of hearing arguments in his first major abortion-related case since taking the bench, Kavanaugh sided with Chief Justice John Roberts and the four left-leaning Supreme Court Justices to decline to review it. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch all wanted to hear the case, but it takes four.

According to Thomas, the move was political.

Kavanaugh, Roberts, side with liberal judges on Planned Parenthood case

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/10/supreme-court-planned-parenthood-defunding-case-845056?lIn February, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling that Kansas was wrong to to end Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid funding, writing that states can’t cut off funding for reasons “unrelated to the provider’s competence and the quality of the healthcare it provides.” Four other appeals courts have ruled that Medicaid patients have the right to access the provider of their choice.

But the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has held that states do have the right to terminate a provider’s Medicaid contract and that residents cannot challenge that decision.

The Supreme Court’s action Monday allows the split decisions to stand in different federal circuits. Thomas, in his dissent, wrote that the Supreme Court should have taken the cases to resolve conflicting findings from lower courts.

“Because of this Court’s inaction, patients in different States — even patients with the same providers — have different rights to challenge their State’s provider decisions,” Thomas wrote.

My Take

Thomas is right. This is the type of case that is ideal for the Supreme Court to resolve the rights of individuals, who are currently bound by different laws in different states. The majority of the time, this isn’t a bad thing. States can and should act differently from one another. However, when it comes to a person’s right to challenge a federal funding, which Medicaid is in part, there needs to be clear direction from the Supreme Court.

As Thomas noted, the reasons for punting on this issue were clear.

“So what explains the court’s refusal to do its job here? I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood.’ That makes the Court’s decision particularly troubling, as the question presented has nothing to do with abortion,” Thomas wrote.

This case had nothing to do with abortion, at least not directly. It was about the rights of the people to challenge how their tax dollars were spent, a fundamental right that drills down to the core of our republic. The mere mention of Planned Parenthood, even outside of the abortion issue, was enough to spook Justice Kavanaugh. He joins Chief Justice Roberts and Republicans on Capitol Hill who are so terrified of Planned Parenthood, they refuse to address the issue even at its most basic level.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement Donate to NOQ Report

Facebook

Twitter

Trending

Copyright © 2018 NOQ Report