Connect with us


Propaganda through headlines: How media discredits the Biblical worldview



My wife asked me last night, “Did the Jews wipe out all of the Canaanites?” This was a strange question coming from my wife who reads the Bible regularly; I often go to her with my own Bible questions.

“No. They were instructed to in Deuteronomy but they didn’t.” I told her.

That’s when she showed me this article on Yahoo from The Telegraph. I was annoyed and considered writing a more factual article, but my wife told me, “Don’t worry. They’re getting toasted in the comments.”

Therein lies the problem with modern “journalism” in an age of constant mass-media-connectivity, an onslaught of digital distractions, and shortened attention spans. Fixing it in the comments won’t prompt most to read the Book of Judges.

27 Neither did Manasseh drive out the inhabitants of Bethshean and her towns, nor Taanach and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Dor and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Ibleam and her towns, nor the inhabitants of Megiddo and her towns: but the Canaanites would dwell in that land.

28 And it came to pass, when Israel was strong, that they put the Canaanites to tribute, and did not utterly drive them out.

29 Neither did Ephraim drive out the Canaanites that dwelt in Gezer; but the Canaanites dwelt in Gezer among them.

30 Neither did Zebulun drive out the inhabitants of Kitron, nor the inhabitants of Nahalol; but the Canaanites dwelt among them, and became tributaries.

31 Neither did Asher drive out the inhabitants of Accho, nor the inhabitants of Zidon, nor of Ahlab, nor of Achzib, nor of Helbah, nor of Aphik, nor of Rehob:

32 But the Asherites dwelt among the Canaanites, the inhabitants of the land: for they did not drive them out.

33 Neither did Naphtali drive out the inhabitants of Bethshemesh, nor the inhabitants of Bethanath; but he dwelt among the Canaanites, the inhabitants of the land: nevertheless the inhabitants of Bethshemesh and of Bethanath became tributaries unto them.

But hey, if Yahoo says the Bible is wrong, it must be, right?

This isn’t new. Newspapers have always posted erroneous front page headlines followed by corrections a couple of days later buried on the bottom of page 6. The difference is today more people are getting their “facts” from headlines and snippets alone.

I’ve watched analytics on my websites like a hawk since 2007. The articles haven’t changed in form; same length, same topics, same basic audience. What’s changed is the length of time people are spending on the pages. I assume (hope) the quality of my writing hasn’t deteriorated by 38% over the years, but the time spent on each individual article has. I’m not alone. This article from 2014 (it’s worse today) shows that over a third of article viewers stay for less than 15 seconds. That means they found the headline interesting enough to click and absorb the information but only scanned or skipped the actual story.

My wife’s assertion that everything’s fine because the article was trashed in the comments misses a big point. The majority of people don’t read the comments. In fact, the vast majority of people who read (and absorbed) the headline didn’t even click on it. Most accepted the premise and tucked it somewhere in their brain. For non-believers who did this, it just reaffirmed their worldview and pushed them further away from seeking a Biblical understanding.

That was the point of the article and headline. This is how today’s media operates.

They love to use powerful triggers within their headlines such as “disproves” or “debunks” whenever they want to advance their narrative. Unfortunately, articles like these have a tendency to spread. Mainstream media loves to extend the lifespan of lies against the Bible or conservatives.

Here’s a Google search for “which canaanites survived”:

Mainstream Media Lies About the Bible

Isn’t it ironic that they went through so much trouble to do DNA testing and write dozens of articles just to verify what the Bible says quite plainly in Judges? Sadly, they then spun it in the headlines to flip reality on its head in order to spread their lies.

Christian, husband, father. EIC, NOQ Report. Co-Founder, the Federalist Party. Just a normal guy who will no longer sit around while the country heads in the wrong direction.

Continue Reading
Advertisement Donate to NOQ Report
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. David L

    July 29, 2017 at 3:03 pm

    A similar search through other Search engine’s revealed the same, sadly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The real reason Ocasio-Cortez is afraid of the press



The real reason Ocasio-Cortez is afraid of the press

For at least the second time, reporters were barred from covering an event featuring Socialist Democratic darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The campaign’s reason: we want attendees to feel comfortable since there’s so much national press covering her.

This is an absolutely ridiculous excuse, of course. Nobody goes to a campaign event without knowing the press will (should) be there. It doesn’t make them less comfortable and may actually give some a sense of security knowing the answers to their questions will be judged by more than the audience at hand. That’s one of the reasons for the press in the first place, to give information about an event to people who cannot attend.

Instead, the press is getting another roadblock:

Ocasio-Cortez bans press from covering campaign event Ocasio-Cortez, the Democratic socialist star running for New York’s 14th congressional district, is facing criticism after her campaign banned journalists from covering a town hall meeting with voters this week.

The Queens Chronicle, a local news outlet, reported that the campaign for the 28-year-old progressive prevented reporters from attending a campaign event in Corona on Sunday, even though it was open to the rest of the public. The campaign reportedly barred reporters from a prior event as well.

It’s conspicuous that a local publication was barred because it runs contrary to the narrative the campaign is trying to sell. So why is she being hidden from reporters at these types of events?

My Take

It’s clear that her exposure is her best friend and worst enemy. Being talked about is a politician’s best friend on the campaign trail, but it also offers a risk of failure. This is most common in events like the town hall meetings she is holding because she’ll be forced to think on her feet.

What if she can’t think on her feet? What if her answers when placed in an unscripted situation the type of answers many would expect from an inexperienced socialist?

Until she’s ready to handle the pressure of having press cover these events, she won’t be ready to hold public office at this level. The House of Representatives isn’t for people who need to be protected from their own answers.

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Ken Ham on how science confirms the Bible



Ken Ham on how science confirms the Bible

One of my biggest pet peeves is the attempt by atheists to use “science” to disprove the Bible. It’s unfortunate on many levels, not the least of which being Pascal’s Wager, but the strangest part is how much of science must be ignored in order to make the claim a Biblical worldview runs counter to modern science.

Some may object to this topic being part of mostly political news site, but it’s been more widely covered in recent years by liberal sites attempting to paint the Biblical worldview in a negative light, so it’s good to give equal time to the counterarguments.

There are better videos than Ken Ham’s discussion on the topic, but few are more easily understood. It’s well worth the hour.

Continue Reading

Culture and Religion

Bettie Cook Scott is a racist politician. And she’s a Democrat.



Bettie Cook Scott is a racist politician And shes a Democrat

Racism is owned by the Republican Party. That’s the narrative the press and their handlers, the Democratic Party, wants America to believe. Someone forgot to get that memo to Michigan state representative Bettie Cook Scott.

Detroit Rep. Bettie Cook Scott on Asian opponent: ‘Don’t vote for the ching-chong!’ than a dozen community groups have called on Rep. Bettie Cook Scott (D-Detroit) to apologize for a series of racial slurs sources say she used to describe her primary election opponent, Rep. Stephanie Chang (D-Detroit).

Scott is alleged to have referred to Chang as “ching-chang” and “the ching-chong” to multiple voters outside polling precincts during last Tuesday’s election. She’s also said to have called one of Chang’s campaign volunteers an “immigrant,” saying “you don’t belong here” and “I want you out of my country.”

My Take

There are two important takeaways here. First is the hypocrisy surrounding Scott, a (formerly) rising star in the Michigan Democratic Party. If the comments she made were spoken by anyone other than a Democrat, the calls wouldn’t be for an apology. The press and social groups would be calling for her to step down and jump into a hole somewhere.

The second point is that in the real world, the one not seen through the lens of liberals and the media, racism exists everywhere. It is not owned by Republicans, conservatives, old people, white people, or any other classification. One can even make a valid argument that it’s no more prominent in the Republican Party than it is in the Democratic Party that supports groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter.

Racism must be eliminated from society. That will never happen as long as so many people naively believe it only exists in the minds of certain people on the political right. It exists everywhere. Accept that and we can work to make it stop.

Continue Reading

NOQ Report Daily




Advertisement Donate to NOQ Report


Copyright © 2017 NOQ Report.